Comparative Review of 2023-2024 AHA and ESC Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndrome Management: Antiplatelet Therapy, Anticoagulation, and Invasive Strategies in NSTEMI
Completed on July 27, 2025 at 7:13 p.m.
"Review and compare the current 2023-2024 clinical practice guidelines from the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) for the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The focus should be on recommendations for initial antiplatelet therapy, choice of anticoagulant, and indications for an early invasive strategy versus a conservative approach in NSTEMI patients."
The following papers were shortlisted based on their titles and snippets but were later discarded after a more detailed analysis of their abstracts determined they were not relevant enough.
-
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in the 2025 ACC/AHA Guideline for acute coronary syndromes: key recommendations
B Bikdeli, F Ujueta, S Rashedi et al. -
Management of Chronic Coronary Syndrome: 2024 Update
Y Xie, J Jiang, J Wang -
… Society of Myocardial Infarction/National Evidence-Based Healthcare Collaborating Agency Guideline for the Pharmacotherapy of Acute Coronary Syndromes
HK Kim, S Ryoo, SH Lee et al. -
The 2024 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation: a viewpoint from a practicing clinician's perspective
T Potpara, GF Romiti, C Sohns -
Antithrombotic Therapy for Acute Coronary Syndrome
T Toyota, H Watanabe, K Kim et al. -
The 2024 ESC guidelines on atrial fibrillation: essential updates for everyday clinical practice
G Boriani, DA Mei, M Vitolo et al. -
Early Invasive or Conservative Strategies for Older Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis
RK Reddy, D Koeckerling, C Eichhorn… -
Invasive Versus Conservative Strategies in Older Adults With Non‐ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Updated Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled …
A Goyal, A Shoaib, MT Khan et al. -
Comparing FFR‐Guided Complete Revascularization and Conservative Management for Non‐Culprit Lesions in STEMI Patients With Multivessel Disease: A …
AR Gonnah, AK Awad, AE Helmy…
Literature Review Synthesis
Comparative Review of 2023-2024 AHA and ESC Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndrome Management
Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating up-to-date and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for optimal patient management. This review synthesizes current recommendations from the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) for 2023-2024, focusing on three critical areas: initial antiplatelet therapy, the choice of anticoagulant, and the indications for early invasive versus conservative strategies in patients with Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI).
Initial Antiplatelet Therapy
Both the AHA/ACC and ESC guidelines have historically recommended 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following ACS as a standard of care (1). However, recent evidence has prompted a re-evaluation of this duration, suggesting that a personalized approach based on ischemic and bleeding risk is more appropriate than a one-size-fits-all regimen (1). The 2023 ESC guidelines, for instance, elaborate on DAPT durations and de-escalation strategies, acknowledging the importance of tailoring therapy (3). Research indicates that de-escalation strategies can reduce bleeding events without increasing ischemic complications compared to prolonged 12-month DAPT (1). Paper 1 highlights that while the Class I recommendation for 12-month DAPT persists, it is not always supported by prospective evidence, leading to potential overtreatment. This underscores a call for guideline updates to better reflect current evidence on optimal DAPT duration and patient selection for de-escalation (1).
Choice of Anticoagulant
Guideline recommendations for anticoagulant therapy in ACS are complex, with some older ESC documents noted for presenting multiple regimens without clear directional guidance, causing confusion (6). While the 2023 ESC guidelines detail antithrombotic therapy, including considerations for patients requiring oral anticoagulation (3), specific comparative details between the latest AHA and ESC guidelines on anticoagulant selection for ACS are not extensively detailed in the provided summaries. The management of anticoagulation in specific contexts, such as device-detected atrial fibrillation, is also an evolving area (10), but its direct comparison within ACS management between the two major guideline bodies requires further specific analysis.
Invasive Versus Conservative Strategies in NSTEMI
The decision between an early invasive strategy and a conservative approach in NSTEMI patients is a cornerstone of ACS management, particularly in older adults where outcomes can be poorer (5). The 2023 ESC guidelines stratify NSTE-ACS patients by risk features to guide invasive management, recommending early angiography for high-risk NSTE-ACS and within 24 hours for others without very high-risk features (3).
Meta-analyses and trials focusing on older populations provide nuanced insights. One meta-analysis found that an invasive strategy significantly reduces the risk of unplanned revascularization and myocardial infarction in older adults with NSTE-ACS, without increasing major bleeding or mortality (4). Another meta-analysis in older ACS patients (≥70 years) showed that while an early invasive strategy reduced recurrent MI and revascularization, it also increased major bleeding, with no significant difference in all-cause death, emphasizing the need for shared decision-making due to competing risks (7). The 'After Eighty' study, a randomized controlled trial in patients aged 80 years or older with NSTE-ACS, demonstrated that an early invasive strategy was superior to conservative management in reducing a composite endpoint of MI, urgent revascularization, stroke, and death over the long term (8).
Despite these findings, older patients are less likely to receive invasive management, possibly due to limited trial representation and challenges in risk assessment related to frailty and comorbidities (5). The ESC guidelines suggest considering invasive management holistically without age cut-offs (5), a sentiment echoed by the emphasis on personalized approaches in NSTE-ACS management (9).
Conclusion
The 2023-2024 guidelines from the AHA and ESC continue to evolve in the management of ACS. While both bodies emphasize timely and evidence-based care, there is a growing consensus towards personalized antiplatelet therapy durations and de-escalation strategies, moving away from rigid 12-month DAPT (1, 3). The choice of anticoagulant remains an area requiring clear direction (6). For NSTEMI patients, particularly the elderly, an early invasive strategy shows benefits in reducing ischemic events, though it carries an increased bleeding risk, necessitating careful risk assessment and shared decision-making (4, 7, 8). The ESC's comprehensive approach, consolidating ACS management and stratifying risk for invasive decisions, offers valuable learning points for other regions (2, 3). Future guideline updates are anticipated to further refine these recommendations based on ongoing research.
Detailed Paper List
1. Demystifying the Contemporary Role of 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Acute Coronary Syndrome
Authors: Marco Valgimigli, Antonio Landi, Dominick J. Angiolillo, Usman Baber, Deepak L. Bhatt, Marc P. Bonaca, Davide Capodanno, David J. Cohen, C. Michael Gibson, Stefan James, Takeshi Kimura, Renato D. Lópes, Shamir R. Mehta, Gilles Montalescot, Dirk Sibbing, Philippe Gabríel Steg, Gregg W. Stone, Robert F. Storey, Pascal Vranckx, Stephan Windecker, Roxana Mehran
Publication Year: 2024
Source/Journal: Circulation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.124.069012
Link: Google Scholar Link
PDF Link: Direct PDF Link
Summary: This paper critically examines the established 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) recommendation for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients, noting it as a Class I recommendation in American and European guidelines despite its origins in studies not designed to determine optimal duration. The authors highlight that subsequent research has questioned the universal 12-month regimen, suggesting shorter durations for high bleeding risk patients and longer durations for high ischemic risk patients. They point out that bleeding risk assessment, rather than ischemic risk, has become a key modifier for DAPT, and various de-escalation strategies have shown reduced bleeding without increasing ischemic events compared to 12-month DAPT. The paper concludes that the continued Class I recommendation for 12-month DAPT, despite a lack of prospective evidence, leads to potential overtreatment and calls for guideline updates to reflect current evidence on optimal DAPT duration.
2. North American perspective on the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes
Authors: Luis Ortega‐Paz, Roxana Mehran, Dominick J. Angiolillo
Publication Year: 2023
Source/Journal: European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuad153
Link: Google Scholar Link
PDF Link: N/A
Summary: This manuscript offers a North American viewpoint on the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for managing acute coronary syndromes (ACS), which now consolidate previous separate documents for ST-segment elevation ACS (STE-ACS) and non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). The paper aims to highlight differences between the 2023 ESC guidelines and the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, noting new and revised recommendations, and discussing future perspectives, although an in-depth comparison is stated to be beyond its scope, with key differences summarized in a table and evolution illustrated in a figure.
3. What US Cardiology Can Learn From the 2023 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes
Authors: Nanette K. Wenger
Publication Year: 2024
Source/Journal: Clinical Cardiology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.24329
Link: Google Scholar Link
PDF Link: Direct PDF Link
Summary: This paper reviews the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), highlighting how US cardiology can learn from them, particularly noting the ESC's comprehensive approach covering unstable angina, NSTEMI, and STEMI in a single document, unlike prior US guidelines. It details the ESC's conceptual framework of 'think A.C.S.' (assessment, invasive management, antithrombotic therapy, revascularization, secondary prevention) and outlines initial assessment strategies including ECG, clinical context, and troponin trends. The guidelines stratify NSTE-ACS patients based on risk features to guide invasive management decisions, recommending early angiography for STEMI and high-risk NSTE-ACS, and within 24 hours for others without very high-risk features. It also elaborates on antithrombotic therapy, including dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) durations, de-escalation strategies, and considerations for patients requiring oral anticoagulation, alongside long-term management goals focusing on lifestyle, pharmacotherapy, and risk factor control.
4. Invasive Versus Conservative Strategies in Older Adults With Non‐ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Updated Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Authors: Aman Goyal, Aqsa Shoaib, Muhammad Taha Khan, Najwa Salim, Izma Ajaz, Areeba Fareed, Samia Aziz Sulaiman, Abu Baker Sheikh, Wael AlJaroudi
Publication Year: 2025
Source/Journal: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31533
Link: Google Scholar Link
PDF Link: N/A
Summary: This meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials involving 2997 patients investigated the optimal management strategy for older adults with Non-ST-elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS). The findings indicate that an invasive strategy significantly reduces the risk of unplanned revascularization and myocardial infarction compared to a conservative approach. However, no significant differences were observed between the two strategies regarding major bleeding, all-cause mortality, composite major adverse events, or stroke.
5. Updated evidence on selection and implementation of an invasive treatment strategy for older patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
Authors: Kieran Gill, Vijay Kunadian
Publication Year: 2025
Source/Journal: Heart
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2024-325157
Link: Google Scholar Link
PDF Link: N/A
Summary: This review examines updated evidence on invasive management strategies for older patients diagnosed with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), a common ACS diagnosis in this demographic. Despite advances, older patients experience poorer outcomes, necessitating specific evidence for this cohort. While ESC guidelines suggest considering invasive management holistically without age cut-offs, older patients are less likely to receive it due to limited trial representation. The paper highlights challenges in assessing risk in older adults due to frailty, cognitive impairment, and comorbidities. The SENIOR-RITA trial indicated that invasive management is safe and reduces non-fatal MI and revascularization in older NSTEMI patients, though not mortality, emphasizing the need for individualized risk assessment and shared decision-making.
6. Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: an algorithm for decision
Authors: M Bertrand, Jean‐Philippe Collet, G. Montalescot
Publication Year: 2007
Source/Journal: European Heart Journal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm546
Link: Google Scholar Link
PDF Link: Direct PDF Link
Summary: This paper is a commentary on updated ESC guidelines for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NST-ACS), praising their comprehensiveness in areas like elderly patient management and bleeding complications. However, the authors express confusion regarding the guidelines' recommendations on anticoagulation, noting that a table presents multiple regimens without clear direction.
7. Early Invasive or Conservative Strategies for Older Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
Authors: Rohin K. Reddy, David Koeckerling, Christian Eichhorn, Yasser Jamil, Maddalena Ardissino, Volker Braun, Haitham Abu Sharar, Norbert Frey, James P. Howard, Yousif Ahmad
Publication Year: 2025
Source/Journal: JAMA Internal Medicine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2058
Link: Google Scholar Link
PDF Link: N/A
Summary: This meta-analysis systematically searched for randomized controlled trials comparing early invasive versus conservative management strategies for patients aged 70 years or older presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The pooled analysis found no significant difference in all-cause death between the two strategies. However, an early invasive strategy was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and repeated coronary revascularization, but also an increased risk of major bleeding. The authors suggest that the competing risks associated with an early invasive strategy should be considered in shared decision-making for older ACS patients.
8. Long-Term Outcomes of Invasive vs Conservative Strategies for Older Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Authors: Erlend Sturle Berg, Nicolai Tegn, Michael Abdelnoor, Kjetil Røysland, Pål Christie Ryalen, Lars Aaberge, Christian Eek, Erik Øie, Vibeke Juliebø, Erik Gjertsen, Anette Hylen Ranhoff, Lars Gullestad, Njord Nordstrand, Bjørn Bendz
Publication Year: 2023
Source/Journal: Journal of the American College of Cardiology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.809
Link: Google Scholar Link
PDF Link: N/A
Summary: This randomized controlled trial, the After Eighty Study, investigated the long-term outcomes of invasive versus conservative treatment strategies in 457 patients aged 80 years or older with Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). After a median follow-up of 5.3 years, the invasive strategy, involving early coronary angiography and potential revascularization, was found to be superior to the conservative strategy (optimal medical therapy alone) in reducing a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, stroke, and death. The invasive approach demonstrated a significant gain in event-free survival at both 5 and 10 years, with results consistent across patient subgroups.
9. Current Management of Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
Authors: Pablo Díez‐Villanueva, César Jiménez-Méndez, Pedro Cepas‐Guillén, Andrea Arenas‐Loriente, Ignacio Fernández‐Herrero, Héctor García‐Pardo, Felipe Díez‐Delhoyo
Publication Year: 2024
Source/Journal: Biomedicines
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12081736
Link: Google Scholar Link
PDF Link: N/A
Summary: This review discusses the management of Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), emphasizing a personalized approach that includes tailored antithrombotic therapies, timely invasive management, and consideration for vulnerable populations like the elderly and those with chronic kidney disease. It also highlights the importance of cardiac rehabilitation and cardiovascular risk factor management for secondary prevention.
10. Cardiology: What You May Have Missed in 2023
Authors: Abdulrahman Alfraih, Achieng Tago, Michael A. LaCombe, William G. Kussmaul
Publication Year: 2024
Source/Journal: Annals of Internal Medicine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/m24-0581
Link: Google Scholar Link
PDF Link: N/A
Summary: This paper reviews selected important cardiology articles from 2023, covering topics such as semaglutide and bempedoic acid for cardiovascular outcomes, conservative versus invasive management in frail, older NSTEMI patients, expedited transfer for cardiac arrest secondary to NSTEMI, thrombolysis in elderly STEMI patients, guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure, noninvasive testing for stable coronary artery disease, anticoagulation in device-detected atrial fibrillation, and transcatheter approaches for mitral and tricuspid regurgitation.